Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder: Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Applicability to Implantable Devices.

The tibial nerve is an established target for neuromodulation in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) and its associated symptoms, including urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Technologies are currently available to deliver tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) through percutaneous devices or through implantable devices. The benefits and safety of percutaneous TNS have led to it as a guideline-recommended therapy. However, patient compliance is limited by the burden of weekly office visits and the need for maintenance treatments. Further, insurance often only covers a limited number of lifetime visits for percutaneous TNS. These factors and others have led to the development, study, and utilization of implantable TNS devices. Implantable TNS devices deliver the same therapeutic mechanism of action for nerve stimulation with a permanent implanted device that provides at-home stimulation rather than in-office therapy delivery. Additionally, there is an added potential for dynamic and patient-centered stimulation. There is a large body of high-quality evidence published for TNS, including numerous randomized controlled trials published on percutaneous TNS which have consistently demonstrated superior efficacy to sham and similar efficacy to that of anticholinergic medications. Percutaneous TNS also performs better than conservative therapy including pelvic floor muscle training. The percutaneous and implantable approaches deliver nerve stimulation to the same target nerve, using the same mechanism of action. Therefore, data from randomized trials of percutaneous TNS are informative for implantable TNS devices. At the time of this article's publication, at least two implantable TNS devices have received marketing authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The objective of this review is to discuss the mechanism of action for TNS and summarize the published literature from clinical trials of percutaneous TNS as a foundation of high-quality evidence for implantable devices targeting the tibial nerve.

A Treatment Algorithm for High-Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice guidelines for management of high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction (HTPFD). High-tone pelvic floor dysfunction is a neuromuscular disorder of the pelvic floor characterized by non-relaxing pelvic floor muscles, resulting in lower urinary tract and defecatory symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic pain. Despite affecting 80% of women with chronic pelvic pain, there are no uniformly accepted guidelines to direct the management of these patients. METHODS: A Delphi method of consensus development was used, comprising three survey rounds administered anonymously via web-based platform (Qualtrics XM) to national experts in the field of HTPFD recruited through targeted invitation between September and December 2021. Eleven experts participated with backgrounds in urology, urogynecology, minimally invasive gynecology, and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) participated. Panelists were asked to rate their agreement with rated evidence-based statements regarding HTPFD treatment. Statements reaching consensus were used to generate a consensus treatment algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 31 statements were reviewed by group members at the first Delphi round with 10 statements reaching consensus. 28 statements were reposed in the second round with 17 reaching consensus. The putative algorithm met clinical consensus in the third round. There was universal agreement for PFPT as first-line treatment for HTPFD. If satisfactory symptom improvement is reached with PFPT, the patient can be discharged with a home exercise program. If no improvement after PFPT, second-line options include trigger or tender point injections, vaginal muscle relaxants, and cognitive behavioral therapy, all of which can also be used in conjunction with PFPT. Onabotulinumtoxin A injections should be used as third line with symptom assessment after 2-4 weeks. There was universal agreement that sacral neuromodulation is fourth-line intervention. The largest identified barrier to care for these patients is access to PFPT. For patients who cannot access PFPT, experts recommend at-home, guided pelvic floor relaxation, self-massage with vaginal wands, and virtual PFPT visits. CONCLUSION: A stepwise approach to the treatment of HTPFD is recommended, with patients often necessitating multiple lines of treatment either sequentially or in conjunction. However, PFPT should be offered first line.

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Removal of Mid-Urethral Mesh Slings Eroded into the Bladder.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Depending on the indication, there are multiple surgical approaches for the removal of mid-urethral mesh slings (MUS): transvaginal, endoscopic, open abdominal, and robotic. We demonstrate the robotic approach to treat MUS that have eroded into the bladder. The robotic approach offers excellent exposure, visualization, and accessibility. Compared to endoscopic approaches, the entire arm of the sling can be removed from the bladder wall, the bladder repaired, and the foreign body completely eliminated. Robotic MUS excision is ideal in patients who would be best served by maximal removal of the mesh from the bladder to prevent future complications. METHODS: In this video, we display 2 different cases showing 2 unique approaches to robotic MUS excision depending on the location of mesh erosion: 1. If a retropubic sling is eroded through the anterior bladder, we begin by dropping the bladder and entering the space of Retzius to locate the mesh arm. 2. If the sling is eroded into the posterior bladder, a cystotomy is made on the anterior dome to visualize the posterior bladder wall. RESULTS: Once the mesh is identified, we follow the mesh graft carefully and dissect it away from surrounding tissues. The dissection is immediately close to the mesh, without fragmenting it, to allow for complete excision and protection of adjacent critical structures. The surgical principles and instrument techniques of robotic mesh excision mirror those utilized for transvaginal mesh excision. Complications of this surgical approach include a urinary leak that may require prolonged catheterization or re-operation and recurrent stress urinary incontinence, in addition to typical operative risks. CONCLUSION: For treatment of mesh erosion into the bladder, a robotic approach offers excellent visualization, is feasible, and well-tolerated. Compared to fragmenting the mesh using an endoscopic approach, the robotic approach has the advantage of excising the mesh definitively and preventing future recurrences of mesh erosion. Properly selected patients should be offered the robotic approach to mesh excision.

Antibiotic use, best practice statement adherence, and UTI rate for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxin-A injection for overactive bladder: A multi-institutional collaboration from the SUFU Research Network (SURN).

INTRODUCTION: Onabotulinumtoxin A (BTX-A) is a well-established treatment for overactive bladder (OAB). The American Urological Association (AUA) 2008 Antibiotic Best Practice Statement (BPS) recommended trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or fluoroquinolone for cystoscopy with manipulation. The aim of the study was to evaluate concordance with antibiotic best practices at the time of BTX-A injection and urinary tract infection (UTI) rates based on antibiotic regimen. METHODS: Men and women undergoing first-time BTX-A injection for idiopathic OAB with 100 units in 2016, within the SUFU Research Network (SURN) multi-institutional retrospective database were included. Patients on suppressive antibiotics were excluded. The primary outcome was concordance of periprocedural antibiotic use with the AUA 2008 BPS antimicrobials of choice for "cystoscopy with manipulation." As a secondary outcome we compared the incidence of UTI among women within 30 days after BTX-A administration. Each outcome was further stratified by procedure setting (office vs. operating room; OR). RESULTS: Of the cohort of 216 subjects (175 women, 41 men) undergoing BTX-A, 24 different periprocedural antibiotic regimens were utilized, and 98 (45%) underwent BTX-A injections in the OR setting while 118 (55%) underwent BTX-A injection in the office. Antibiotics were given to 86% of patients in the OR versus 77% in office, and 8.3% of subjects received BPS concordant antibiotics in the OR versus 82% in office. UTI rates did not vary significantly among the 141 subjects who received antibiotics and had 30-day follow-up (8% BPS-concordant vs. 16% BPS-discordant, CI -2.4% to 19%, p = 0.13). A sensitivity analysis of UTI rates based on procedure setting (office vs. OR) did not demonstrate any difference in UTI rates (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective multi-institutional study demonstrates that antibiotic regimens and adherence to the 2008 AUA BPS were highly variable among providers with lower rates of BPS concordant antibiotic use in the OR setting. UTI rates at 30 days following BTX-A did not vary significantly based on concordance with the BPS or procedure setting.

Rationale and design of an implant procedure and pivotal study to evaluate safety and effectiveness of Medtronic's tibial neuromodulation device.

Percutaneous tibial neuromodulation is a medical guideline recommended therapy for treating symptoms of overactive bladder. Stimulation is delivered to the tibial nerve via a thin needle placed percutaneously for 30 min once a week for 12-weeks, and monthly thereafter. Studies have shown that this therapy can effectively relieve symptoms of overactive bladder; however, the frequent office visits present a barrier to patients and can impact therapy effectiveness. To mitigate the burden of frequent clinic visits, small implantable devices are being developed to deliver tibial neuromodulation. These devices are implanted during a single minimally invasive procedure and deliver stimulation intermittently, similar to percutaneous tibial neuromodulation. Here, we describe the implant procedure and design of a pivotal study evaluating the safety and effectiveness for an implantable tibial neuromodulation device. The Evaluation of Implantable Tibial Neuromodulation (TITAN 2) pivotal study is a prospective, multicenter, investigational device exemption study being conducted at up to 30 sites in the United States and enrolling subjects with symptoms of overactive bladder.

Spouses Speak Up: The Impact of Mesh Sling Complications on the Patient's Spouse-A Qualitative Analysis Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the perspectives, attitudes, and beliefs of the spouses of women with complications of mesh midurethral sling (MUS) surgery with the goal of increasing our understanding of the multidimensional nature of MUS surgery complications. METHODS: After IRB approval, the spouses of patients who underwent surgery for MUS complications at a single tertiary care institution participated in qualitative interviews. Using an interview guide with standardized prompts, semistructured interviews were conducted. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and reviewed line-by-line by two researchers independently. Inductive content analysis was used to code the transcripts and identify themes, and consensus was achieved by the research team. RESULTS: Seven male spouses participated in qualitative interviews, and several themes and subthemes were identified. First, spouses expressed feelings of regret. They described that their partner's dyspareunia detracted from their intimate relationship. The participants also reported the negative impact on their lives and their households. Due to the personal nature of the issue, couples would avoid involving friends and family, creating a sense of isolation. Finally, they expressed hope of finding a healthcare team experienced with mesh complications and invested in their spouse's improvement. CONCLUSION: Spouses of women who experience MUS complications serve as caregivers and provide support; they are impacted by adverse outcomes. It is important to acknowledge their role in patients' healthcare experiences and learn from their insights. Our study lays the foundation for future work and ultimately for improving the experiences of patients and their spouses with MUS surgery and potential complications.

Wealth of Knowledge and Passion: Patient Perspectives on Vaginal Estrogen as Expressed on Reddit.

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively analyze the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of women regarding genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and vaginal estrogen therapy as expressed on Reddit, a public, anonymous internet forum for discussion and information sharing. METHODS: "r/menopause," a Subreddit with >30,000 subscribers, was queried for "vaginal estrogen" to collect postings related to vaginal estrogen in October 2022. Posts were analyzed qualitatively by 2 independent researchers. The principles of grounded theory were applied, and preliminary themes were generated. These themes were used to derive emergent concepts. RESULTS: Sixty-seven unique posts with 1101 responses were analyzed. Qualitative analysis revealed 5 preliminary themes: (1) questions regarding medication usage, (2) medication side effects, (3) medication alternatives, (4) frustration with the medical system, and (5) seeking validation for symptoms and experiences. Three emergent concepts were derived: (1) women experience bothersome side effects from menopause, and they desire compassionate and effective medical treatment; (2) women are engaged and active participants in their health and health care decisions; and (3) women perceive that their concerns are not taken seriously and seek validation for their medical conditions. CONCLUSION: Peri- and post-menopausal women have many questions and concerns about the condition of GSM and vaginal estrogen as treatment. They also have a broad range of frustrations including access to health care and questions about the usage of vaginal estrogen. By better understanding patient perspectives, physicians can better meet women's needs and improve care for GSM.

Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellows' case logs remained stable during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent staffing shortages there was concern about the case volume, and thus competency, of graduating trainees due to reduced surgical volumes. Elective procedures were particularly affected, which includes Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) cases. To understand whether FPMRS fellows were affected, we assessed their case logs for changes during the pandemic. METHODS: The nationally aggregated case logs of graduating FPMRS fellows, both urology and obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN), were obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The available academic years (AYs) included 2018-2019, 2019-2020, and 2020-2021. Standard deviation for each index category was derived from the average and 90th percentile data. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare differences in case volumes for tracked index categories between AYs. RESULTS: Graduating fellows logged an average of 517.4 (standard deviation [SD] 28.6) and 818.0 (SD 37.9) cases, for urology and OBGYN respectively, over their fellowship training during the examined period. No significant differences in total surgical procedures were found for either specialty between pre-COVID AY 2018-2019 and COVID-affected AYs 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. For urology fellows, gastrointestinal (GI) procedures was the only index case category with a significant difference, and it was a decrease between the two COVID-affected AYs: 2020-2021 compared to 2019-2020 (8.9 vs. 4.2, p = 0.04). For both urology and OBGYN fellows, there was a statistically significant decrease in graft/mesh augmentation procedures from COVID-affected AY 2019-2020 to AY 2020-2021. This may be attributed to the reclassification of mesh removal cases from graft/mesh augmentation procedures to genital procedures in 2020-2021. There was not a significant decrease in these procedures from pre-COVID AY 2018-2019 to the COVID-affected AYs. There were no other statistically significant differences between AYs for OBGYN fellows. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical case volumes for FPMRS urology and OBGYN fellows who trained during the COVID-19 pandemic were comparable to those of their pre-pandemic peers. No significant differences between pre-COVID and COVID-affected years were found for either total surgical procedures or index case categories. Despite disruptions in health care nationwide, FPMRS trainee case volumes were largely unaffected.

Engaging and Empowering Female Urologists in Academic Publishing and Peer Review.

N/A.

"Vagina" Is Not a Bad Word: Historical and Contemporary Censorship of the Word "Vagina".

OBJECTIVE: To characterize instances of censorship of the word "vagina" to better understand perceptions and behaviors surrounding the word. METHODS: Internet and relevant database (PubMed, Academic OneFile, Proquest, Health Business Elite, etc) searches were conducted for the words "vagina," "censor," and related wildcard terms. Search results were filtered by three independent reviewers for relevance. Related articles were summarized and reviewed for common themes. In addition, interviews were conducted with three people who have personal experience with censorship of the word "vagina." Interviews were transcribed and also reviewed for common themes. RESULTS: Examples of censorship of the word "vagina" were compiled, and several themes were identified: (1) Policies surrounding censorship are unclear; (2) Policies appear highly variable; (3) There are differing standards between references to male and female genitalia; and (4) Objections often call the use of "vagina" overtly sexual, profane, or unprofessional. CONCLUSION: The word "vagina" is censored across multiple platforms and policies regarding censorship are inconsistent and unclear. Pervasive censorship of the word "vagina" perpetuates a culture of ignorance and shame about women's bodies. Until we normalize the word "vagina," we cannot make progress on women's pelvic health.

Evidence-based review of nonantibiotic urinary tract infection prevention strategies for women: a patient-centered approach.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a growing interest in nonantibiotic prevention strategies for recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). Our objective is to provide a focused, pragmatic review of the latest evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Vaginal estrogen is well tolerated and effective for preventing rUTI in postmenopausal women. Cranberry supplements at sufficient doses are effective in preventing uncomplicated rUTI. Methenamine, d -mannose, and increased hydration all have evidence to support their use, although the evidence is of somewhat variable quality. SUMMARY: There is sufficient evidence to recommend vaginal estrogen and cranberry as first-line rUTI prevention strategies, particularly in postmenopausal women. Prevention strategies can be used in series or in tandem, based on patient preference and tolerance for side effects, to create effective nonantibiotic rUTI prevention strategies.

Creating an Extraordinary Experience for Women Undergoing Cystoscopy: A Patient-Centered Approach to Process Improvement.

OBJECTIVE: To re-examine and improve the cystoscopy process for women based on patient input. While cystoscopy is a common urological procedure, women perceive it as invasive, personal, and fear-inducing. Patients want to be treated as individuals and not just another "procedure." METHODS: Women's perspectives on cystoscopy were collected using experience-based design. Observations and timings, emotion word lists, debrief forms, patient surveys, simulation, and interviews were used. A structured 2-day quality improvement event included both in-person and virtual patient participation to gain a deeper understanding of patients' perspectives. Ideas for process improvements were generated using brainstorming, creativity exercises, and prioritization. These changes were implemented and refined using an iterative process based on feedback. RESULTS: Patients who reported feeling grateful for the positive impact of their care tended to minimize procedure-associated wait times, inconvenience, and discomfort. Women in the evaluation phase of their treatment and those who were unhappy with their symptoms tended to magnify the negative emotions associated with their procedure. Patient feedback and areas for improvement specific to women's needs were identified. Actionable changes were implemented including engaging clinic staff, updating the cystoscopy workflow, and physical changes to enhance patient privacy. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing the needs of women undergoing cystoscopy improves satisfaction as their emotional, physical, and knowledge-based needs are addressed. Active participation in the health care process empowers patients to have a voice in their care. An extraordinary experience with cystoscopy may decrease anxiety of the unknown and help patients have control over the experience.

Updates to Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: AUA/CUA/SUFU Guideline.

PURPOSE: In 2019 the American Urological Association (AUA) released the evidence-based guideline "Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: AUA/CUA/SUFU Guideline." Information supporting the guideline came from a 2019 systematic evidence review prepared for the AUA by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC). The AUA used evidence found for 11 Key Questions (Appendix C) in the EPC's report to derive 16 Guideline Statements. In 2021 the EPC conducted an Update Literature Review (ULR) assessing abstracts from new studies published since the 2019 systematic review. The AUA asked the EPC to further assess a subset of studies included in the ULR report, to support potential changes to the 2019 guideline. MATERIALS/METHODS: A systematic-review utilized research from the Oregon Health & Science University. Pacific Northwest EPC was used to update the 2019 AUA Guideline on rUTI in women with new evidence published through 2021. RESULTS: Updates were made to reflect changes in literature since 2019. Updates include recent publications on antibiotic prophylaxis, non-antibiotic prophylaxis, and estrogen therapy. CONCLUSION: The presence of rUTI is crucial to the health of patients and its effects must be considered for the welfare of society. This document will undergo updating as the knowledge regarding current treatments and future treatment options continues to expand. .

Effect of COVID-19 on Graduating Urology Resident Case Logs: Analysis of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education National Data Reports.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the national case logs of the first graduating urologic resident cohorts to have trained during the COVID-19 pandemic for effects on surgical volumes. METHODS: The nationally aggregated Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education urology resident case logs were obtained for graduates of academic years (AYs) 2015-2016 through 2020-2021. Case volume differences for tracked index categories were compared between AYs with a 1-way analysis of variance. Data were then combined into pre-COVID and COVID-affected resident cohorts and differences in average cases logged were analyzed with 2-tailed student's t-tests. RESULTS: Graduating urology residents logged an average of 1322 (SD 24.8) cases over their residency during the examined period. Total cases had multiple statistical differences between AYs but the only index category with a statistically significant decrease for a COVID-affected AY compared to pre-COVID AY was pediatric majors: AY 2020-2021 logged fewer cases than AY 2015-2016 (53.9 vs 63.0, P = .004) and AY 2018-2019 (53.9 vs 61.2, P = .04). When aggregated into pre- and COVID-affected cohorts, both pediatric minor (123.4 vs 117.5, P = .049) and pediatric major (61.4 vs 56.8, P = .003) case averages decreased for the COVID-affected cohort of residents, but no adult index category decreased. CONCLUSION: National graduating urology resident surgical volume for adult index categories was maintained through the pandemic. Pediatric cases saw a statistical decrease in volume of questionable clinical significance. This does not eliminate concern that individuals may have experienced a detrimental impact on their resident education.

Examination of Information and Misinformation about Urinary Tract Infections on TikTok and YouTube.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess the quality and accuracy of the most highly viewed YouTube and TikTok posts related to urinary tract infections (UTIs). Social media is increasingly a resource for health information. YouTube and TikTok videos are highly utilized and are potentially a source of helpful information or misinformation. METHODS: During January 2021, "UTI" was searched within YouTube and TikTok and the most relevant videos were identified and analyzed for their content. Accuracy of scientific information, possible misinformation, and credibility of the videos was rated independently by three reviewers. Posts were categorized as educational/informational, shared experience, humor/entertainment, and home remedies/alternative therapies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In 50 YouTube and 50 TikTok videos respectively, the median number of views was 49K and 1.4M, the median number of likes was 296 and 58K, and the median number of comments was 50 and 616. The proportion of female to male presenters was equal for YouTube videos while 94% of those from TikTok were female. Overall, YouTube videos had higher median scores for scientific information, credibility, and less misinformation compared to TikTok. YouTube videos with more views, likes, and comments tended to have lower scores in all categories and more misinformation. More presenters were medical professionals on YouTube videos than those on TikTok. While videos from both platforms contained misinformation, none promoted misinformation that would cause harm to health. Healthcare providers should be aware of the potential influence of social media as patients are getting health information from many sources.

Opioid-Limiting Pain Control After Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a multimodal opioid-limiting protocol and patient education intervention can reduce postoperative opioid use following transurethral resection of the prostate. METHODS: This prospective, non-blinded, single-institution, randomized controlled trial (NCT04102566) assigned 50 patients undergoing a transurethral resection of the prostate to either a standard of care control (SOC) or multimodal experimental group (MMG). The intervention included adding ibuprofen to the postoperative pain regimen, promoting appropriate opioid use while hospitalized, an educational intervention, and discharging without opioid prescription. Data regarding demographics, operative data, opioid use, pain scores, and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included, n = 23 (MMG) and n = 24 (SOC). Demographic and operative findings were similar. Statistical analysis for noninferiority demonstrated non-inferior inpatient pain control (mean pain score 2.5 MMG vs 2.4 SOC, P = 0.0003). The multimodal group used significantly fewer morphine milligram equivalents after discharge (0 vs 4.1, P = 0.04). Inpatient use was reduced but did not reach statistical significance (6.0 vs 9.8, P = 0.2). Mean satisfaction scores with pain control were similar (9.6 MMG vs 9.2 SOC, P = 0.32). No opioid prescriptions were requested after discharge. Adverse events and medication side effects were infrequent and largely similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an opioid-limiting postoperative pain protocol and patient education resulted in no outpatient opioid use while maintaining patient satisfaction with pain control. Eliminating opioids following a common urologic procedure will decrease risk of opioid-related adverse events and have a positive downstream impact.

Incomplete bladder emptying and urinary tract infections after botulinum toxin injection for overactive bladder: Multi-institutional collaboration from the SUFU research network.

INTRODUCTION: Onabotulinumtoxin A (BTX-A) is an effective therapy for overactive bladder (OAB), however, adverse events may prevent patients from initiating therapy. The study objective was to report real-world rates of incomplete emptying and urinary tract infection (UTI) in men and women undergoing BTX-A for OAB. METHODS: Eleven clinical sites performed a retrospective study of adults undergoing first-time BTX-A injection (100 units) for idiopathic OAB in 2016. Exclusions included: postvoid residual (PVR) > 150 ml, prior BTX-A, pelvic radiation, or need for preprocedure catheterization. Primary outcomes at 6 months were incomplete emptying (clean intermittent catheterization [CIC] or PVR ≥ 300 ml without the need for CIC); and UTI (symptoms with either positive culture or urinalysis or empiric treatment). We compared rates of incomplete emptying and UTI within and between sexes, using univariate and multivariable models. RESULTS: 278 patients (48 men and 230 women) met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 65.5 years (range: 24-95). 35% of men and 17% of women had incomplete emptying. Men had 2.4 (95% CI: 1.04-5.49) higher odds of incomplete emptying than women. 17% of men and 23.5% of women had ≥1 UTI, the majority of which occurred within the first month following injection. The strongest predictor of UTI was a history of prior UTI (OR: 4.2 [95% CI: 1.7-10.3]). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter retrospective study, rates of incomplete emptying and UTI were higher than many previously published studies. Men were at particular risk for incomplete emptying. Prior UTI was the primary risk factor for postprocedure UTI.

The Evolving Story of Mesh Mid Urethral Slings: The Surgeon's Perspective.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to obtain the perspectives of surgeons who treat female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and better understand their range of experiences with mesh mid urethral sling (MUS) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study recruited gynecologic and urological surgeons who treat SUI. Surgeons were interviewed by phone and in person using a standardized interview guide. Interviews were transcribed, de-identified, and analyzed by 2 independent researchers. The transcripts were coded and summarized using the principles of thematic analysis. The research team came to consensus that a saturation of ideas representing a diverse demographic of surgeons had been achieved. RESULTS: Twenty-four interviews of surgeons from diverse geographic locations and practice types were performed. Many surgeons described MUS surgery as rewarding and favorably impactful for women with SUI, while others grappled with the serious risks associated with MUS surgery. Those who had treated women with life-altering pain after MUS recounted impactful patient stories. Many stated that recognition, acknowledgement, and appropriate referral of complications were fundamental to responsible and ethical care. Some surgeons expressed frustration and concern about the raised level of controversy and anxiety regarding the MUS landscape. All participants expressed that there was substantial room for improvement in multiple domains. Participants also shared their optimal strategies relevant to MUS surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite diverse views regarding the role of the MUS, there was agreement among surgeons that the surgeon-patient relationship, thorough informed consent and patient counseling, and accountability are essential when implanting MUSs.

Listening to Learn: A Qualitative Analysis of Women's Experiences with Mesh Mid-urethral Sling Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To improve women's experiences with mesh mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), we sought to qualitatively examine patient perspectives of MUS surgery, organize resulting patient-derived themes, and present our findings as potential springboards for future research and quality improvement efforts. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured focus groups and interviews of patients who had undergone mesh MUS surgery at a single tertiary referral institution. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and analyzed using deductive and inductive content analysis. Two researchers independently performed line-by-line coding which was verified by two additional researchers. RESULTS: Eleven women participated. Most sought SUI care after becoming frustrated with their symptoms. However, some participants experienced barriers to care or dismissal of their symptoms by their physicians. While participants expected improvements in SUI symptoms after MUS surgery, some expected improvement or resolution of other pelvic floor-related issues such as bowel symptoms. Despite having improved SUI symptoms, participants described non-SUI symptoms as negative outcomes from their MUS surgery. Overall, participants wished SUI-associated embarrassment could be lessened and suggested public service announcements to help normalize discussion of SUI symptoms. CONCLUSION: Obtaining first-hand information from SUI patients who have undergone MUS surgery provides insights into what matters to patients. Information from this study can help support further investigation into barriers to care for SUI patients and further study into improving counseling on goals and expectations of MUS surgery. The themes complement the current knowledge on MUS by providing insights that can only be collected through open-ended inquiry.